As is, I think, generally agreed, the whole concept of research has not been well defined and I’ve never understood how an idea becomes a research project. I was merely suggesting a way of formalising that.
Classic Commerce and Classic SEO, as ClassicPress Research projects, have benefited enormously from CP support.
This differs from what was voted on by the committee and what has already been agreed:
I think there are many points of confusion.
But can I just make a few things clear:
I suggested some form of vetting process because the definition of what is a research project has always been vague at best.
In suggesting there be some kind of vetting process, I was aiming to adhere to CP’s policy of openness and transparency.
If the consensus is that there should be no vetting of ideas before they become research project, I’m perfectly OK with that.
If I have any doubts about anything, I will consult with fellow team leaders.
So can we put all of the above behind us and move on???