Some Changes to be made to CP Site (main and forum) and related proposals

Projects Documentation
21

@wadestriebel not sure about this but wouldn’t it be better to link about to where we describe our stuff, and remove committee from the footer, because there’s no committee
The about currently links to a list of team leaders as far i see, which could be understood as a committee - but is somewhat misleading - see my opening post section “this I can’t do”

I think best is simply remove the committe link, link about to that page and in that page link to that “list of team leaders”
I can add the links inside the page but I can’t edit tje footer

22

I think we can remove the Team Leads to be honest, being a little blunt but most the team leads haven’t been active for a while so I would rather just remove it and allow people to help out as they see fit.

Thoughts?

3 Likes
23

Agreed. Let’s get some momentum going organically instead of by designating specific roles (which has led effectively — though not intentionally — to vetoes).

4 Likes
24

Fully agreed.

  • Remove the stuff currently linked to in about.
  • remove committe link all together
  • add the link currently used for committe to about

That’d conclude the major points of this tick
Apart of the header but it’s not super urgent I think.
Although would be nice to have :upside_down_face:

3 Likes
25

I have WP parser setup in a dev environment; everything seems to work and everything was extracted.

I also installed the other plugins from that age and found the handbook one is block dependent.

2 Likes
26

@azurecurve - did you see Docs Site - GitHub Plugin Usage - #22 by anon66243189?
I am already adding theme styles and bells and whistles - the content is ready.

However I only plan to add the code for now, the handbook … we may add but needs a tad editing.

1 Like
27

Yes, I did see that you were making good progress.

I thought it might be useful for a second person to have the parser setup and available (plus I like messing about with stuff).

It also gives me an environment to work for helping with any of the parts we need to write.

2 Likes
28

I’ve to apologize for my previous comment
It probably came off the wrong way.

Reading it now it seems I intended to “stop” you from doing valuable work or even worse compare results :disappointed:, which of course wasn’t in my intention at all.

It’s of course nothing but right to have more than one instance (we’ll need it) and there’s nothing else to say but:
Great work, and my apologies to come off the wrong way. I should have chosen my words wiser.

Thanks - not only for the contribution on weekend but also for giving me a chance to “reiterate” my own words which clearly sometimes need more thought.

29

No problem at all.

1 Like
30

A bit late to see this and reply, but yes to all proposed changes from me. Let me or Wade know what you need in order to keep moving forward, and for any changes to the backend of the site (code, plugins, themes, etc) please keep me in the loop.

1 Like
31

Thanks @James

See the main opening post.
Heading This I cannot do on my own:
That entire part I cannot do on my own and has not been yet done.

The rest of this ticket is resolved, as I made the changes already:
the proposal part section 1, will be happening as time goes forwards; section 2, well, it happened already and will be maintained going forward.

Thus - since I do not want to edit code on the main CP site, from my end, nothing else is needed other than complete the task with the things I cannot do.
I think @wadestriebel volunteered to complete those.

1 Like