We’re not critical of the way that the marketing is done, especially with the constraints. ![]()
I’m mainly concerned that CP is moving into a new phase of its life cycle and how that changes the market / user needs.
Devs / “innovators” mainly joined because of a common enemy in GB.
But that won’t sustain them forever.
And “without GB” won’t appeal to “early adopters”, especially in business.
v2 IS about a lot more than just that and we’d like to see that come out in the messaging.
Elisabetta summarized it well in her original post.
We’d also like to help maintain a united community vision, with nuanced perspectives.
At this point in an organizational life cycle, it is so easy for functions to lose sight of one another.
Personally, I would like this to work because I want to use CP v2 ![]()
I’d be happy to help where I can, but I know there are also others who are very capable and willing. @ElisabettaCarrara could draft the personas for everyone’s input?
I can work on the other document in the meantime with K.