We need to have something Request for Comments (RFC) or Python Enhancement Proposals (PEP) so we can demonstrate a clear case-study for each case we present.
Read-only archive: https://petitions.classicpress.net/posts/44/rfc-pep-mechanism-for-classicpress
Author: stefanos82
Vote count: 2
Status: open
No comments posted.
Does someone know what this is?
If not, we might/should close the petition?
So it’s like a feature request / petition?
As far I read it’s about sending an email to a group and get feedback on how much my “rfc” is liked or disliked … so I guess we do have that here in form of the forum/petition, as far I understand- and thus probably not needed to further pursue.
Ya I think we are okay with the current petition process for now 
Setting to close in 7 days instead of immediately as is our standard practice for closing petitions.
This could be interpreted as a way to refine and further organize the petitions process, for example a way to implement a “no” vote on petitions as suggested in another thread, but I think it would be better to raise small, specific changes to the petitions process as separate petitions.
This topic was automatically closed after 7 days. New replies are no longer allowed.