Marketing Meeting Transcript: July 28, 2020


Hope not to be off-topic, but I already like “Builders”. With the capital B.

And… if someone reads “page builders”… not so bad. I’ve 2 sites using a pagebuilder that are still alive thanks to CP. Having developer of page builders stepping in could also be something very interesting…


I liked “ClassicPress is for builders” also, but I think many people in the WP space take this to mean “page builders”. Someone who reads this meaning would think CP is not for people who don’t use page builders, which is worth avoiding.


A post was split to a new topic: Page builders or site builders?

Personally, I would prefer Classicpress for Creators or though I like the idea of the dropdown with different variations.

The only thing though that I don’t really like though would drop the CMS. I know technically that is what we are, but most people I know or talk to use the words website, blogs etc.

So I would in actual fact add Website in the phrase above so would have;

Classicpress for Website Creators



I like the “ClassicPress for Website Creators” slogan by itself but here are two reasons not to use it.

First, this is very, very similar to an existing product. We were wondering about this similarity already and I don’t think we should move further in that direction:

The Flexible Platform Empowering Website Creators
Joomla! is an award-winning content management system (CMS), which enables you to build web sites and powerful online applications.

Second, CMS is a more meaningful term than website. Under the commonly used definition of the term a web CMS can do websites with static pages, blogs, and much more.

Since “CMS” has a commonly understood meaning that is not very ambiguous I think we should keep it. We can use the rest of the page space below the tagline to elaborate on what exactly is meant by that, and who ClassicPress is meant to serve.


Didn’t realise that the ‘Website Creators’ was being used, so understand why it isn’t possible to use that.

I also know what you mean about the “CMS” but if we were marketing purely to professionals, then I would be all for it, but as we are trying to enlarge our reach to ordinary individuals as well, I just think a term that is more commonly used, even if it isn’t used in the right way, would be better thats all.

I am sure that most people who want a CMS for business, blogs online shopping etc will search for how to make a website and not how to make a CMS, and I would imagine (as i haven’t searched it myself) that more searches and how to videos would use website instead of CMS.

1 Like

I think something like this could be a good basis for a targeted SEO campaign.

1 Like

Thanks so much for the feedback!

Many other solutions in our space use the acronym “CMS” in their tagline and/or identification. Looking at Google Results, this is how each CMS reads in the title: Open Source CMS A CMS Platform for great digital experiences Blog Tool, Publishing Platform, and CMS Joomla Content Management System (CMS) - try it for free! Textpattern CMS

However, here are the platforms that identify as “website builders”: Free Website Builder | Create a Free Website Build a Website - Website Builder Create a Free Website or Blog Create your own free website in minutes Free Website Builder: Build a Free Website or Online Store…

If I had to choose which group ClassicPress belongs in… well, I think we want to be seen as a CMS and not a website builder.


Although we might want to be seen as a CMS, i would have thought it would be better to target and try and poach people in the second group.

I am just worried that if we are not careful, we will end up looking like a specialised CMS for a specific job, when I thought we would be better to market ourselves as a versatile platform for all types of websites, and for all types of levels, which in turn would increase our chance of getting developers interested in making plugins, themes etc made for our platform.


Here’s another one:

TYPO3 — the Professional, Flexible Content Management System

I like what @BlueSkyPhoenix was describing above (in the meeting) when she said:

have creators as the main/first word, but have that word then cycle through with other words.

I think this is similar to what PyroCMS have done on their homepage banner / hero / thingy.

I wonder if we could do something similar ish?

ClassicPress: the CMS for Creators …… ClassicPress: the CMS for Builders …… ClassicPress: the CMS for Developers …… ClassicPress: the CMS for Businesses …… ClassicPress: the CMS for Designers …… ClassicPress: the CMS for Creators ……

But whatever we do, I still think our best chance at this time of increasing our user base and attracting developers is by targeting the 25% or so of WP users that haven’t upgraded to WP5. For them, it’s a very simple switch with minimal effort and zero learning curve. It should, in theory, be a no brainer. In this case, ClassicPress: the CMS for WordPress Users should be our main message.

As an aside, for those that like numbers and stats:

According to BuiltWith, WordPress has a 37% share of the market with approx. 27m live websites.

Let’s just say 20% of those WordPress sites are still on WP4.x. That’s 20% of 27m which equates to 5.4m websites.

If we were to gain just 10% of those 5.4m sites, that would give us 540,000 sites and moves us firmly into the big league.

I know things are never that simple but it makes you think.

1 Like

I think the bigger problem though, is all this marketing is wonderful, but I fear will be wasted.

First we need to try and work out why the 20 percent of the wordpress sites haven’t updated, as if they do not won’t to use Gutenburg, then they can continue with the classic editor (for now).

Then we need to put ourselves in their position. Why would they switch to a virtually identical CMS, especially if they are using the classic editor, when we offer all the plugins and themes from the WP directory and don’t have our own.

There is no incentive to swap from a large user base CMS to us. (At least not at the moment)

We also need to try and establish, why those sites haven’t updated (haven’t a clue how though), then we could then do the marketing campaign based around those reasons to move to us.


Yep, the people who are drawn to Wix, Squarespace and Weebly are not likely to have either the motivation or the aptitude to use CP. Personally I don’t think there’s any point in targeting them.

I think this is the key to growing the userbase. Like @spanner44 though, I’m not immediately sure how we do this.


I think this is the crux of the problem we have with marketing CP. Why would they take the risk of switching platforms for no perceived benefit?

As long as there is a way to disable gutenberg/blocks, they are perfectly happy where they are. Very few people look further ahead than they need to, and most don’t realize the mess they are going to be in eventually.

WordPress without blocks” is our major selling point. We need to get that message out, loud and clear. We need to educate people about where WP is heading and how CP can prevent their sites suddenly going wheels up in a year or two.


These are the very issues we’re working on right now. The fact is, there are many reasons for switching to CP which this page on the CP website aims to highlight.

This page is just one line of “attack” and takes a more direct approach, specifically targeting users of WP 4.9 and below and also people still using the Classic Editor. The page will also form part of the marketing plan, particularly on social media, for the next few months. @BlueSkyPhoenix may want to elaborate on this.

But that won’t be the case forever and that will be one of the messages we’ll be trying to get across. I would hazard a guess that a large chunk of those people still on WP4.9 know that they’re going to have to make a decision sooner or later.


Well done. I don’t visit the website often, so I didn’t know that was there.


That is a fantastic article, hits the right tone and gives the right info. Kudos to the author. But I didn’t know it was there until this morning! Cue hasty retweets.


Now that sounds awesome :slight_smile:


Have we done market research? If so, please point me to it and disregard the rest of this post. :slight_smile:

I’ve only been sort of following with the marketing discussions, but, I’m not sure the target market(s) are as well-defined as they could be. I think we’ve discussed the market’s needs, but, haven’t surveyed the actual market? Aren’t we basically projecting our own needs and calling that the market? We early adopters probably have different or more reasons for switching than an average site owner/administrator might have. I suspect this is why we’re in sort of a perpetual redesign of the target market parameters and the potential messages – because we don’t truly know who the market is and what their needs are, we’re just basing on what our own needs have been. Of course, to be fair, we are a part of the market…but we’re already here.

Is ClassicPress for businesses? Is it for creators? Is it for influencers? Is it for entrepreneurs? Yes!

Without real survey information to help us understand why they haven’t switched, I’m not sure we can craft the right message and get it in front of the right people. We seem to have a strategy, but, are lacking the tactical aspects. I think that survey data could help us accurately identify the right market(s) and give us a better chance at coming up with the tactics.

If any of this makes sense (and isn’t already negated by marketing research I haven’t yet seen,) my questions from here might be:

  1. How do we find these sites/people?
  2. Do we just google for 4.9 sites?_
  3. How do we make contact? Onsite contact form? Email? Social? Or…?
  4. How can we collect survey information?_

I think that goes back to the discussion on a person to replace Scott as the public face of CP.

While the post on the website does a good job of explaining the benefits of CP, who is going to know it’s there?

I’m hopeless at marketing, but I know one thing for sure - you have to spend a lot of time on promotion. The “Build it and they will come” theory doesn’t work online.